
001
Adaptive Benchmark Pipeline
The pipeline I used to move from public and local sensor data into ESP32 measurements, algorithm profiles and the adaptive rules used in the project.
Lab
Small experiments, benchmarks and technical tests from projects I've worked on.
Interactive experiment / 005
Switch between the three rule states used in the prototype and see what the project actually measured. I keep the claims tied to this benchmark instead of turning them into universal rules.
This state favors situations where processing cost and energy matter most.
SPECK was about 5.39x faster than the AES software baseline
SPECK measured energy was about 75% lower than the AES software baseline
These numbers come from this project benchmark
SPECK / SIMON / ASCON / AES software baseline

001
The pipeline I used to move from public and local sensor data into ESP32 measurements, algorithm profiles and the adaptive rules used in the project.

002
A project-specific comparison of computation time and measured energy. I wanted the decision to come from the actual benchmark, not from a generic assumption about the algorithms.

003
The throughput comparison for SPECK, SIMON, ASCON and the AES software baseline from the same project benchmark.

004
An OCR workflow that finds text regions, recognizes the content and places searchable text back at the matching coordinates in the document.